Something went wrong
Try again later.
Takers
A Los Angeles a hard-boiled detective races to bust a group of notorious thieves before they can carry out a 20-million-dollar heist.
5 June 1975, San Francisco, California, USA
28 June 1971, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
2 May 1983, New York City, New York, USA
31 January 1947, New York City, New York, USA
8 May 1970, Oconomowoc, Wisconsin, USA
3 December 1965, Chicago, Illinois, USA
4 November 1977, London, England, UK
February 12, 2013
"Taken 2" is really, really goofy -- it's even goofier because it thinks it's about the futility of vengeance -- but Liam Neeson almost makes you buy it.
October 05, 2012
As much as this picture is action driven, its greatest delights are grounded in personality, in the fun of having a protagonist who combines homespun values with velociraptor functionality.
October 05, 2012
So lazily put together that it relies on flashbacks from its predecessor for the majority of its character development.
May 26, 2013
I surrender! I simply cannot absorb another fist, bullet or knife thrust into my atrophying brain by a hyperventilating Liam Neeson in the name of his stupid, twitty movie daughter, Kim.
October 24, 2014
More of the same, but what's in its favor, is Neeson's never-failing man's man toughness, which goes a long way in making for an entertaining film.
April 17, 2016
A sequel to a surprise but modest hit has no right to be this lackluster.
October 07, 2012
A meta-American movie, a Godardian spoof of the whole genre, an attempt to see how stupid and insulting a motion picture can be and still be a big hit.
July 20, 2013
The follow-up has less action, less energy, less Liam Neeson awesomeness - in other words less of everything that people liked about the first one.
October 07, 2012
Taken 2 is more of the same, except a little bigger, a little dumber, and a little less invigorating.
October 05, 2012
Neeson, despite having turned 60 in June, looks spritely enough in the role, and more than capable of another go-round should Taken 2 match its predecessor's success.
October 14, 2012
A sloppy, lazy, unintentionally laughable sequel.
June 21, 2016
A lazy, cynical film made for one reason only: to part you from your hard-earned cash. That all said, it holds one's attention surprisingly well.